Jimmy T.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Jimmy T |
Can't Believe it. |
Lead | |
|
Not a report in a month....
Jimmy T. |
|||
dr gonzoe |
|||
|
Are you talking about the 4 mile ditch? Check your fly often. |
|||
stinnetti |
|||
|
Boy your right about that, isn't it a shame. The Jewel of the Ozarks a lost treasure !!!!
What are we going to do about it BOYS ?? |
|||
FlyFishAR |
|||
|
The addition of the C&R zone and special regulation area is just around the corner. AGFC is "finally" paying some attention to that river.
You'd think that a river tha produced a world record would be treated a little better than a bass-turd child.
|
|||
stinnetti |
|||
|
Yes John thats good news. it is alarming how the state let the fisherie down over the last several years. Hopefully their attention will help remedy the
situation over the next several years.
|
|||
FlyFishAR |
|||
|
That is if the bait guys don't submarine the new regs.
|
|||
Brian Shaffer |
|||
|
Can they do that JW ? how ?
cheers, Brian
" Just once, I wish a trout would wink at me. "
|
|||
FlyFishAR |
|||
|
There are always those trying to work behind the scenes.
|
|||
FlipMiller |
|||
|
Bait fishing guys vs. fly fishing guys. Kinda like the old west when the sheephearders vs. the cattleman fighting over land.
|
|||
Jimmy T |
|||
|
If it were only that simple Flip....
J |
|||
Davyfly |
|||
|
So far as l am aware, there is not a issue with the trout docks at the dam end so far as increasing the TZ upstream, but there is for the proposed lower below
the handicap access.
Davy
http://davywotton.com.
Fly Fishing Schools and guide services. |
|||
oneculm.clarksclassicfl... |
|||
|
Wow Brian how nice to have found you at this board. You must have lots of friends here as this is all about your home waters.
|
|||
cfowler |
|||
|
I'll bite on this one... I don't claim to know what everyone down that way thinks about this. I understrand a little bit about both sides of the
conflicts between fly fishers and bait fishers down there. Both can have some element of truth and myth to them. Not all bait fishers are the same and
likewise with fly fishers. Ironically they both think the other group has alot of "power" and influence to subvert the other's interest in the
use of the resource. And, they both share interest in the health of the resource.
Also, keep in mind from a practical standpoint those guys down there can be quite challenged with water levels and clarity at times, even if they are bait fishing. It's hard to take all your trips all the way over to Rim vs going up the Norfork. The Norfork has typically been their go to for that situation. It does get backed up a ways up there too, so the lower end has some significance to them. If the Norfork isn't an option they'll have to waste much of the day motoring up above the Buffalo at least to find decent water. They really don't have the ability to haul all the trips over to Rim. This has really been an important dynamic for them in the last couple years with the crazy water. |
|||
FlyFishAR |
|||
|
Dragging out my soap box....... There is no mention of "banning" people from fishing an area just that they will have to practice C&R if they choose to fish that area. Which by the way occupies roughly 1% of the fish-able water in the White River System. Secondly AGFC is doing away with another C&R area down river at the request of commercial bait operations and the additional C&R was to replace it's closure. Lastly they can also fish from the island down or run up past the current C&R area. The additional C&R will not effect their operations at all really since they can't go past the first shoal on low water anyway. Effectively this only effects about 1/4 mile of the water they are using. It would be an extremely rare rare rare case where the White was totally blown out and there was no way to run up past the C&R area. In the odd 1 or 2
days per year where that actually happened it is not worth everyone bending over to accommodate the needs of a very small minority of the stake holders. After
all this was debated and overwhelmingly approved during "multiple" public meetings.
|
|||
Drifter |
|||
|
John - No need to apologize for the so called "rant". There needs to be rants about the asp-holes that flaunt the regs and break all of them to catch
a fish. Drag chains have been illegal on the North Fork for many years. And why should there ahve to be "*+* for tat" on the amount of c&r zones.
There is so much water that people can fish that basically have no regs on how you catch fish.
Now my rant on the treble hook crap! Those that are gung-ho for this reg are just lazy and cheap! I also guide spin fishers and fish the c&r areas alot. I have a full big Plano box of crank baits that have been converted to single barbless lures and a bunch of spinners that came with single hooks. Plus as someone had said they can use a bubble and fly. It is a slippery slope that we are headed on if the Barbed Trebles are allowed. The AGFC has used studies that support the barbs, but there is other studies that give a dimmer view of the effects. Plus I don't think they used one day wonders to do the study that have to use towels to hold on to those slimy fish. Here is a BIG poopo to those guides that say they can't fish the c&r because of the regs. Change your tactics and methods and don't be so freekin' cheap and lazy! And if you have to carry a huge can of corn to prime the pump, maybe you should flip burgers instead!
Ken "Drifter" Richards
"Life's too short not to row a boat." http://justfishinguides.com http://justfishinguides.wordpress.com http://DrifterPhotos.etsy.com |
|||
creek critter |
|||
|
AMEN Drifter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|||
stinnetti |
|||
|
way to givem hell drifter !! That is so true.
John, your rant or position is well taken. The rules are set for everybody some fisherpeople just need to adapt !! SS |
|||
Davyfly |
|||
|
Here is a interesting thing for you to think about.
Montana for one, has no regulations for the use of barbless hooks. In this State the legal limit is two hooks for any species, one single is same as one treble. Therefore you can fish the Madison or any of the other gold medal waters out there with two barbed trebles no matter what they are attached too. Regulations more or less the same for PA/NJ/NY/CT, all be it there are zones designated at CR and others than have what they term as seasonal harvest. Montana to the best of my knowledge generates more income from trout fishing than any other State in the US by far. OK, the comparison here is that our Trophy zones are but a few miles of the entire system that is more or less open to all methods, the regulations otherwise are related to harvest issue, numbers and size. Mortality is a accepted percentage, and the only reason why that is the case is simply due to the vast numbers of fish that are stocked, and that is also very much reliant on the fact that the Norfork National Fish Hatchery is able to produce some 450,000 lbs of fish weight a year and it is also very reliant on other USFW facilities to provide the eggs for us to hatch. If anything catastrophic such as loss of funds or disease hit this facility every business on the White river system would be in big trouble., make no mistake about that. Given the current rates of harvest and mortality it would take a very short time to reduce the system to one that holds very few fish to satisfy the current activity. Those of us who guide the river on a daily basis can see the marked difference when within a few days, 1000s of fish are no longer present, it is unreal and to be honest l have never seen anything close to this for any other trout fishery l have fished around the world. Bear this in mind also. Jeff Williams does not make the regulation changes, it is the commissioners that do that for both game and fish. Jeff, will listen to all sides of the story, which is a far cry from what we had to deal with years back. Look at it also further, in the past 10 years we have seen many changes that have benefited the overall fishery. We no longer stock 8 to 10 ins Bows, we have reduced harvest and larger minimums for other species that can be harvested. John pointed out many issues that are at the end of the day related to enforcement of the regulations, and there is no doubt things could improve here. The barbless hook rule is a very emotive issue, how many who read this board have had a ticket for this one, l know at least 3 persons myself. Do you consider this fair if say you are using a average size trout fly and get one, or do you consider that there is a considerable difference related to method of fishing ? A barbed treble against a size 16 sowbug. At the end of the day the majority would related this to what percentage of damage may be caused to the fish. Barbless trebles are at the end of the day no more detrimental than a larger streamer hook, and l have had a good many large trout swallow those in the past. And likewise l have caught 100s of trout and Salmon with barbless treble hooks, either one or more to the lure. Like it or not for the best will in the world FF also cause mortality even if barbless hooks are used. Not all handle fish with care, bear in mind many also choose to harvest fish, and l have no problem with that if the fishery can support that. You can harvest fish from the Madison river in designated zones, no size limit and 5 per day.! Go further with this one. How many of our trophy Browns do you think we loose when they are deeply hooked when bait is used, craws and sculpins, way more than you might realise at the end of the day. This year l have seen more dead and dying Browns in the 16 ins above size due to the new regs. It is a percentages game, l guess , if 40 die out of 100 we are still left with 60, that may or may not have been harvested if the regulation was not in effect. Are we then to see a regulation that restricts use of bait or mandatory use of barbless hooks, may be in the future, who knows. I did have a very long discussion with Jeff, and did tell him that both in my and Dave Whitlocks opinion to allow barbed trebles in our very restricted TZ would be a mistake, regardless of what ever data form other sources says otherwise. They were not conducted on a river system that comprises of a few miles of TZ water and is subject to the pressure we see in those zones, and lets be honest here, it is largely related to FF activity. Barbless is another issue, for l have to say l do not believe that the use of trebles at BSD has in any way been detrimental to this short section of TZ. In fact last night l caught a 7lb Bow there, and over the years have seen more trophy Bows caught here than any other place on the entire system, that's why we choose to fish there, it produces on average way better Rainbow trout. Browns are a very different deal as we know they are well spread out. If l personally were restricted to one zone on the river it would be BSD no question of doubt. Aside from regulation issues the whole picture of the fishery needs to be considered here, and l would agree with a recent article the Fox Statler wrote, and he is absolutely right. Our major concerns should be directed more to the issues of water quality and habitat resource, and not so much those related to personal preferences in so far as how we see regulation issues. Regardless, fish need the resources of habitat and food base, regulations may well be just a cover up when it come to the real issues of concern at the end of the day. Its like saying, fence deer in a barren field some of which die due to no food base, and also allow limited harvest , when the other side of the fence contains enough food base to enable all to survive, propagate, and grow with limited harvest. Which is the better option here. Frankly l do not see, unless many issues such as habitat, water quality and there after regulations any significant change for the North Fork river, it is indeed a very sorry state of affairs here. I hope l am wrong here. One other point here. I did suggest to Jeff that l would like to see same for the North Fork so far as no kill for Brown trout for the same period as we see here at the BSD end down to the end of the State Park. Granted the 24 ins size limit may help some here at the end of the day, all be it methods of angling will result in high mortality as they always do. Davy. Davy.
http://davywotton.com.
Fly Fishing Schools and guide services. |
|||
FlyFishAR |
|||
|
The Norfork supports roughly 250,000 angler hours per year as compared to 1,200,000 on the White. The Norfork supports that on roughly 5 miles as compared to
nearly 150 miles on the White. The Norfork has virtually zero didymo, has a very active spawn, has healty hatches all years long, and has produced world record
fish in the past and still does. To even suggest that it is in trouble due to habitat is not really a fair comment.
Where the Norfork is in trouble is from pressure. The Norfork sees roughly 7 times the pressure that the White sees. In the area in question it sees probably 50 times the pressure of the average mile on the White. Plus the fact that it is harvest haven and still produces trophy browns. These regulations go to the heart of that problem. We are not going to solve water quality issues over night. The issue of over harvest is something that could be resolved "tomorrow". |
|||
cfowler |
|||
|
I can't believe I'm doing this... For those that say the guides need to adapt, I'd just like to point out that they have no control over what
abilities a client brings to the dock. These aren't fly fishers, which come with above average skills and very different expectations. A good portion of
the time these are parents and kids and they're doing well just to get them to catch some fish. (Kids really want to keep those fish too by the way.)
I'm not trying to be an antagonist but I don't think it may be as simple as changing tactics, please feel free to correct my ignorance.
|
|||
Drifter |
|||
|
OK - I'll start the beatings, but with a wet noodle. I guide people with a wide range of abilities. In fact most of my fishermen are of the below average
skill level even those that don't know which end of the rod to hold.
The high water last year made a markedly difference in my catch ratio. We caught less small stockers and more trophy fish. In fact my fishermen caught more trophies last year than any other year. I am not bragging on my ability as a guide but consider my abilities as inferior to many on this board. You just have to change your tactics or at least be open to change. Many of the bait guides I consider friends and are good stewards of the fishery. A smallminority of bait and fly fishermen have spoiled it for evryone with the us and them mind set. My biggest gripe is the open flaunting of breaking the regulations in order to catch fish. Some guides guaranty a limit of fish or the trip is free. I would never put myself or my guide business under that kind of pressure. It would be too easy to slip over the line to ensure a paying trip. I do not have a real problem with treble hooks, if they are barbless. It is just such a huge jump from single barbless hook to unlimited barbed treble hooks. This change may be partly my fault since I have been harping on letting FFers use a dropper in the c&r areas for many, many years. Maybe this is a response to this. It would be hard to sell this to FFers and not give something to hardwear fishermen. Enforcement and water quality issues are by far the biggest issues on the North Fork. As to the crowding on the river, I would suggest only waders and drift boats be allowed - No motorized boats!!!
Ken "Drifter" Richards
"Life's too short not to row a boat." http://justfishinguides.com http://justfishinguides.wordpress.com http://DrifterPhotos.etsy.com |
|||